Perioperative Management of Cerebral Protection of an Acute DeBakey Type 1 Aortic Dissection with Stroke in Evolution

Christian Barotti MD, Yong G. Peng MD, Ph.D.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Case Report: A 66-year-old black male with a long-standing history of hypertension presented with some vague upper abdominal pain. A CT scan demonstrated a widened mediastinum. Upon further work up, the patient was diagnosed with acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection. He was air-lifted to our institution for definitive management. Approximately six hours after initial diagnosis, the he arrived in the operating room in a combative state, with an 18 gauge peripheral IV on the right upper extremity and a 20 gauge left radial arterial line in place. Right upper extremity pulses were not palpable.
Due to the emergent clinical situation, the surgeons agreed to proceed with anesthetic induction. Arterial blood pressure was 110/70 mmHg accompanied by sinus tachycardia with a rate of 130 beats/min. During preoxygenation, a two-channel bipolar electroencephalogram demonstrated a pattern consistent with burst suppression, and a low bifrontal regional cerebral oximetry reading was recorded at 33. Anesthetic induction was initiated with a titration of midazolam 5mg, fentanyl 1000mcg, lidocaine 80mg and succinylcholine 100mg. The patient was intubated with cricoid pressure without difficulty, relaxed with pancuronium 8mg. As positive pressure ventilation was initiated, he became hypotensive and SBP drifted down to 50-60 mmHg. The patient was placed in the Trendelenburg position, followed by titration of CaCl 500mg, phenylephrine 120mcg and aggressive fluid resuscitation. Mean arterial pressure was maintained around 60mmHg to avoid progression of the aortic dissection. Using ultrasound guidance, a 9 French introducer and 12 French double lumen catheter were placed in the right internal jugular vein. Of note, during ultrasound inspection, in addition to the bilateral carotid dissections, a large pericardial effusion was noted. Ventilation with low tidal volumes without PEEP was maintained along with continued fluid resuscitation to maximize preload. An oximetric pulmonary artery catheter was floated and a transesophageal echocardiography probe (TEE) was placed. The initial pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 50/35 mmHg with a central venous pressure (CVP) of 35 mmHg. TEE confirmed significant pericardial effusion, a thick ventricle but no coronary artery involvement. Femoral-femoral cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) was initiated prior to sternotomy to avoid uncontrolled bleeding. Upon drainage of the pericardial effusion PAP and CVP decreased to 18/8 and 7 mmHg, respectively. Cerebral oximetry readings increased to 51, and the electroencephalographic activity increased. Dopamine, mannitol and furosemide were utilized during the surgery in an attempt to preserve the renal function. The patient underwent replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch utilizing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for 22 minutes and retrograde cerebral perfusion. The total CBP time was 157 minutes. He was transferred to CICU in stable condition on dopamine 2mcg/kg/minute and NTG 3 mcg/kg/minute with return of a right upper extremity pulse.
Unfortunately, the patient’s post-operative course was complicated by two episodes of bleeding requiring mediastinal exploration, a small bowel resection for necrotic bowel, and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. He was extubated 9 days after the initial operation and was discharged to a local rehabilitation center 32 days after initial aortic dissection repair for further recovery. Upon discharge, he was alert, oriented demonstrating minimal left lower extremity weakness.

Discussion: The perioperative neurological monitoring and cerebral protection continue to pose significant challenges to anesthesiologists who care for patients with acute type 1 aortic dissection. In order to minimize their postoperative neurological sequelae, the perioperative anesthetic monitoring and management for this high risk patient population will be discussed.

 

Department Patents

Faculty Research

GAARRC Abstracts


2000 - Cole, Deckinga, Denson, Fuchs, Maples, Naik, Robicsek, R. Zhang

2001 - Denney, Fuchs, Liem, Palacios, Rajasekaran, Rice, Sessions

2002
- Fuchs, Li #1, Li #2, Mayo, Ozcan, Tagalakis,

2003 - Barotti, Barry, Ozcan, Patel, Robinson, Swinney, Tran, van der Heusen , Walters

2004 - Abbasian, Bird, Cahill, Chang, Dahleen, Durret, Horowitz, Perschau, Robinson, Muehlschlegel, Santiago, Velez, Wendling

2005 case reports - Bauernfeind, Cummens, Dagen, Dobija, Yavas

2006 - Book, Chen, Covington, Eisenman, Ficarotta, Hyde, Jordan, Le, Lesko, Moorjani, Muehlschlegel, Seghal, Stine, Tilman