// you’re reading...

Case Discussion

Regional Anesthesia for Breast Surgery: Case Discussion for the Week of November 2, 2009

A 45 year-old female presents for unilateral, radical mastectomy. The patient has a history of malignant hyperthermia, is allergic to egg yolks, refuses etomidate due to nausea with prior uses, fears bad dreams from ketamine, worries about drug interactions with thiopental, dislikes the forgetfulness of benzodiazepines, and fears addiction from opioids. The patient is also intensely claustrophobic. She requests a regional anesthetic for her surgery, and complete avoidance of sedation or general anesthesia.

Questions for consideration:

1. Is propofol contraindicated based upon her allergy?

2. How would you counsel this patient on the risks, benefits and alternatives of her request?

3. For a complete regional anesthetic, which nerves would need to be blocked? Which nerve blocks would you employ?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis

Related posts:

  1. Blocking for Breast Surgery: Case for Discussion, Week of April 13 2009
  2. TAP Blocks and C-Sections: Case Discussion for the Week of November 16, 2009
  3. Whither the multimers? vWD and Regional Anesthesia: Case Discussion for the Week of September 14, 2009

Discussion

2 comments for “Regional Anesthesia for Breast Surgery: Case Discussion for the Week of November 2, 2009”

  1. 1. There is no straightforward answer to propofol and egg allergy. People allergic to eggs are most likely allergic to the protein component and Diprivan is highly purified so it is probably ok. The literature is below. However in this patient who has this particular complicated history, I think any clinician would “play it safe” and not sedate with propofol.

    Bassett,C.W., Talusan-Canlas,E., Holtzin,L., Kumar,S., Chiaramonte,L.T.
    An adverse reaction to propofol in a patient with egg hypersensitivity
    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1994* 93 (1) Part 2: 242 Abs 476

    Hiyama,D.T., Griggs,B., Mittman,R.J., et. al.
    Hypersensitivity following lipid emulsion infusion in an adult patient
    Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1989, 13 (3) 318 – 320

    Kamath,K.R., Berry,A.
    Acute hypersensitivity reaction to Intralipid
    New Engalnd Journal of Medicine, 1981, Feb 5* 360

    Laxenaire,M.C., Maten-Bermejo,E., Moneret-Vautrin,D.A., Gueant,J.L.
    Life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions to propofol (’Diprivan’)
    Anesthesiology, 1992, 77: 275 – 280

    Sampson,H., Cook,S.K.
    Food allergy and the potential allergenicity-antigenicity of microparticulated egg and cow’s milk proteins
    Journal of the Amercian College of Nutrition, 1990* 9 (4)* 410 – 417

    Posted by Andrea Toufexis Esch | November 18, 2009, 1:31 pm
  2. 2. I would refer her to Dr Tighe!! What a nightmare history. If she is clausterphobic she will not do well awake. She did not mention having an adversity to nitrous. You could do straight regional with nitrous and O2 and I think she would need to accept benzos if she could not tolerate the procedure. Ofcourse conversion to GA is always the gold standard back up plan and having a high thoracic block may bother her a lot. Avoiding triggers of MH and taking seriously her egg allergy would involve opioid based anesthesia and then we get into the discussion of opioids and immunosuppression with breast cancer. I think that I would delay her case and seek an allergist opinion about propofol (have her tested?) and then use a propofol based anesthetic if GA or sedation was needed.

    Posted by Andrea Toufexis Esch | November 18, 2009, 1:58 pm

Post a comment

Calendar of Posts

November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Subscribe to SMS

By confirming my cell number, I agree that I am responsible for all of my carrier text messaging charges.

Disclaimer: Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broadens our knowledge, changes in treatment and techniques are required. The author has checked with sources believed to be reliable in an effort to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. The opinions expressed in this work represent those of the author and, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the author nor the University of Florida nor any other party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers and viewers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources.