// you’re reading...

Case Discussion

Legal Case of the Month: October 2009

A 42 year-old high earning medical professional that mostly works with his hand (he was a surgeon), and is also a very keen fly fisherman, developed a small rotator cuff tear that bothered him with fly-fishing. He sought the help of a famous orthopaedic surgeon in another state who could fix this tear arthroscopically.
The anesthesia selected for this procedure was a continuous interscalene nerve block combined with light general anesthesia, although the patient expressed the doubt if he needed the continuous nerve block. In spite ofLegal Case of the Month: August 2009

Disclaimer: The legal cases presented in this section are actual cases dealt with by Dr A P Boezaart as expert witness.  They are not dramatized and are factually presented to serve as learning experiences and teaching tool through cases that have no chance of ever getting published in the regular literature or otherwise reaching our attention.  Defense lawyers will never allow their clients to publish their mistakes.  The cases are presented in good faith, taking great care to avoid any references that can possibly identify the patient, the anesthesiologist, the surgeon, and the hospital the state or any other factor that may identify the case or put its outcome in jeopardy.  Most of these cases are settled out of court and are not sub judicae anymore.  If they are still sub judicae that is without the knowledge of the author.  If anybody recognizes the case, they are most likely mistaken.

What follows is intended for Residents and Fellows to serve ONLY as a teaching tool. Other practitioners are welcome to read it and perhaps learn from it.

André P Boezaart, MD, PhD that,

A 42 year-old high earning medical professional that mostly works with his hand (he was a surgeon), and is also a very keen fly fisherman, developed a small rotator cuff tear that bothered him with fly-fishing. He sought the help of a famous orthopaedic surgeon in another state who could fix this tear arthroscopically.

The anesthesia selected for this procedure was a continuous interscalene nerve block combined with light general anesthesia, although the patient expressed the doubt if he needed the continuous nerve block. In spite of that…

Read more

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis

Related posts:

  1. Legal Case of the Month – May 2009
  2. Legal Case of the Month: August 2009
  3. Delayed onset quadriparesis and bilateral ptosis following an interscalene block- Case discussion week of 0ct 5th 2009

Discussion

One comment for “Legal Case of the Month: October 2009”

  1. What, if any, indication is there to attempt removal after injecting normal saline through the catheter? Should we attempt this, or proceed directly to fluoroscopy?
    Thanks!

    Posted by Sarah | October 26, 2009, 9:52 am

Post a comment

Calendar of Posts

October 2009
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Subscribe to SMS

By confirming my cell number, I agree that I am responsible for all of my carrier text messaging charges.

Disclaimer: Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broadens our knowledge, changes in treatment and techniques are required. The author has checked with sources believed to be reliable in an effort to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. The opinions expressed in this work represent those of the author and, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the author nor the University of Florida nor any other party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers and viewers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources.